HOMICIDE INVESTIGATION
We
Specialize in the following types of Murder cases:
|
| Homicide |
Felony Murder |
| 1st Degree Murder |
2nd Degree Murder |
| Manslaughter |
Assault w/intent to kill |
| Death Penalty |
Conspiracy To Commit Murder |

Homicide
is the killing of one person by another. There
are a variety of homicide charges used in the United States,
such as First Degree murder, Second Degree Murder, and Manslaughter.
All homicide charges require a thorough, effective, competent
and aggressive defense team., consisting of a skilled criminal
defense lawyer, and a thorough criminal defense investigator
that specializes in homicide investigation, However, it is
possible in some instances to charge a defendant under the
federal murder statute, which in some cases allows for the
death penalty.
First
degree murder requires pre-mediation. In
other words, a prosecutor must prove that a person thought
out the murder beforehand and specifically formulated an intention
to kill the victim. First degree murder is the most serious
criminal charge in Michigan law, and is punishable by mandatory
life in prison, without possibility of parole. Michigan law
does not allow for the death penalty for any charge, including
first degree murder.
Felony
murder is a special class of first degree. This
crime involves the loss of life during the commission of specific
felonies. These felonies include Arson, Criminal Sexual Conduct,
First Degree Child Abuse, major controlled substance offenses,
Robbery, Carjacking, Home invasion, Larceny, Extortion, and
Kidnapping. Michigan law mandates life in prison for any person
found guilty of felony murder.
Second
degree murder. Second
degree murder is a lesser charge, however it still caries a
potential severe punishment. In a second degree murder charge,
the prosecution is not charged with the obligation to prove
that the person thought out the killing beforehand. Second
degree murder is punishable by life in prison, or any term
of years. However, the possibility of parole does exist.
Manslaughter
has two degrees, voluntary and involuntary. In
all cases, manslaughter is the unlawful killing of another
without malice. Voluntary manslaughter involves an intentional
killing, but one that is done in the heat of passion. Involuntary
manslaughter is an unintentional killing. In both cases, manslaughter
is punishable by 15 years in prison.
Our
Approach to Charges of Homicide
A
successful defense requires a thorough knowledge of the details. In
all cases, your knowledge of the facts is important and must
be thoroughly explored with the defense team. Attempts
must be made to interview all witnesses.We
are trained and experienced in preparing homicide cases for
the defense. The niche that we have in the criminal investigation
market is that, all of our investigators are street savvy and
African American. A major objective of any good criminal defense
homicide investigator is help the defense Attorney to break
down prosecution witnesses by utilizing vigorous cross examination
techniques, thus reducing, if not eliminating their credibility
and the weight given to their testimony by the judge or jury.
This is where our expertise augments defense efforts.
We
provide critical investigations into all aspects of the defense
case, which include location of witnesses and leads, obtaining
statements, evaluation of police investigations, evidence collection
and review, independent analysis, background investigations,
crime scene investigations, documentation analysis and regional
canvassing, mitigation evidence, photographic and videotape evidence
as well as other services directed by the client.
The
Agency gathers essential evidence, and witnesses that not only
support your case, but aid in critical determinations that influence
the outcome of verdicts.
We
at the agency have special access and an intimate understanding
of the minority community, which has cultivated our unique niche
in the field of criminal investigations
Expert
witnesses can be a key element of your defense. While
not all cases require the use of experts, there are many cases
where scientific experts can be invaluable. This may include
such experts as DNA scientists, medical doctors, psychologists,
document and handwriting analysis experts, fingerprint & "voiceprint" experts
and police investigation experts. It is not possible to know
what experts may be needed until your case is thoroughly evaluated
The agency is committed to help finding the best scientific
experts available in defense of our clients.
Police
investigations must be carefully scrutinized. In
our system of justice, it is defense attorneys that force law
enforcement personnel to play by the rules. In our criminal
defense investigative agency, we find it beneficial to our
clients to challenge unlawful intrusions on your rights. Our
team of professionals will carefully examine your case for
violations of law, which can be asserted in your defense.
If
You are Facing Homicide Charges
Let's
begin with the understanding that the police are not your friends
and they are not there to help you. It is legal to for the police
to lie to you. Promises made by the police are not enforceable.
Miranda warnings may not help you, so if the police are investigating:
- Don't
negotiate with police without an attorney. In most cases, police
will attempt to secure your cooperation before you have a chance
to talk to an attorney. They are aware that a person accused
of a homicide is never more vulnerable than at the time of
the first arrest or raid. Before you compromise your position
in the case, obtain competent legal advise from an aggressive
trial lawyer.
- Do
not talk. Be polite and courteous, but refuse to discuss their
investigation with them. You should plainly and repeatedly
tell them that you do not want to discuss anything with them,
and that you want an attorney present. Do not allow yourself
to be tricked or coerced by the police.
- Anything
you say about the case to anyone, including most family members,
can be used against you in court. Many defendants hurt their
case by discussing it with family, friends, co-workers, police
officers and prosecutors. If you have made such statements,
we will deal with it together. If you have not, DON'T!
- Never
consent to anything without the advice of your attorney. This
includes giving the police permission to search, draw blood
or discuss the case with you.
- Never
resist arrest. If a police officer is attempting to arrest
you, be polite and cooperative. Inform the officer that you
will go along peacefully. It is also important to immediately
inform the officer -or any officer that tries to question you-
that you do not want to talk without an attorney.
- The
only information you should provide without consulting an attorney
is necessary biographical information; this includes your full
legal name and address. If the police want to fingerprint you
after arrest cooperate fully.
- Inform
the officers that you wish to make a telephone call. Get an
attorney quickly, if you call family or friends have them contact
an attorney. Our criminal defense investigators are on call
at all times of the day and night. You can reach us at 1-1.877.202.8787
- Post
bond as quickly as possible. If you are arraigned and asked
how you plead, your response should be, "I stand mute." At
the arraignment, do not try to talk to the judge about your
case.
- If
you are unable to post bond, don't say anything about your
case to anyone in the jail. There is no one there that you
can trust.
 |
 |
Criminal & White
Collar Investigations
We are experts in criminal investigation.
We conduct timely, and thorough investigations in the following
areas, that may involve alleged criminal activity:
|
Conspiracy
|
Corporate Crimes
|
Counterfeiting
|
Currency & Securities
|
|
Death Penalty
|
Due Diligence
|
Embezzlement
|
Fraud
|
|
Homicide
|
Kidnapping
|
Litigation Support
|
Money Laundering
|
|
Multi-Codefendant
|
Narcotics
|
Public Corruption
|
Robbery
|
|
Sexual Assault &
Harassment
|
Smuggling
|
Theft
|
Trafficking
|
A major objective of any good criminal
defense is to break down prosecution witnesses by utilizing vigorous
cross examination techniques, thus reducing if not eliminating
their credibility and the weight given to their testimony by
the judge or jury. This is where our expertise augments defense
efforts.
We provide critical investigations into
all aspects of the defense case, which includes location of witnesses
and leads, obtaining statements, evaluation of police investigation,
evidence collection and review, independent analysis, background
investigations, crime scene investigations, documentation analysis
and regional canvassing, mitigation evidence, photographic and
videotape evidence as well as other services directed by the
client.
The
Agency gathers essential evidence, and witnesses that not only
support your case, but aid in critical determinations that influence
the outcome of verdicts.
We at the agency have special access and
a intimate understanding of the minority community, which has
cultivated our unique niche in the field of criminal investigations.
Representative Case Reviews
Synopsis 1
Case: United States vs. Salvador Magluta
Jurisdiction: Southern District of Florida
Charge: Conspiracy; Witness Tampering; Obstruction Of Justice;
Forfeiture; Murder; Money- Laundering
Disposition: JURY TRIAL - Acquitted of 31 counts of a 43 count
Indictment
DEFENSE COUNSEL: CALL TO
FIND OUT !!!
Criminal Defense Investigator: Paris
London 1.877.202.8787
Prosecution's theory of case: client ran the biggest drug organization
in the United States, and after he was acquitted by a jury of
his peers for trafficking 72 tons of cocaine, he was only acquitted
because he caused three murders of witnesses that was suppose
to testify at trial, and laundered 25 millions dollars of illegal
proceeds to pay for his defense. Along with bribing the jury,
and tampering with government witness, and obstructing justice.
Details of Investigation: Conduct background investigations and
interviewed client regarding current case and prior criminal history;
investigated and located over 150 defense witnesses housed in federal
institutions nationwide. Interviewed and did extensive background,
criminal history, and family location checks. Interviewed and located
over 150 civilian witness from a ledger dating between 1985-1995
consisting of 25 million dollars worth of disbursements. Took pictures
and investigated three homicide cases and crime scenes. Located
and retrieved numerous records, documents, and reports nationwide
regarding clients past and present cases. Located names and address
of all governmental confidential informants, and dates of debriefings.
Located the following toll records: cellular, pager, and home telephone.
Located and investigated the panel of jurors that set on clients
prior case where he was acquitted of 72 tons of cocaine. Subpoenaed
numerous witness, and documents nationwide for case. Obtain and
help design numerous trial exhibits consisting of charts, graphs,
and diagrams. Testified at trial.
Synopsis 2
Case: United States vs. Jerome Earls
Jurisdiction: Superior Court for the District of Columbia
Charge: Murder I While Armed (Premeditated)
Disposition: JURY TRIAL-VERDICT NOT GUILTY
Defense Counsel: CALL TO FIND OUT!!!
Criminal Defense Investigator: Paris London 1.877.202.8787
Prosecution's theory of the case: The defendant rode around Northeast Washington DC looking for the victim. The defendant rode past the victims mothers house, as well as the victims girlfriend house on the day that the victim was killed. The victim was killed when he pulled up at a light that the defendant was stopped at. The victim had his girlfriend in the car with him. This whole case was about the victim owing the defendant for an unpaid drug debt.
Details of Investigation: Conduct background investigations and interview client regarding current case and prior criminal history; located and interviewed all involved witnesses. Interviewed an eyewitness that stated the decedents conversation consisted of killing the defendant everyday. That the decedent rode around looking for the defendant, and calling his girlfriends cell phone trying to find out where the defendant resided. I learned the identity of the only eyewitness to the murder (the decedent’s girlfriend). Found out that the decedent’s mother was arrested for threatening the decedent’s girlfriend. Took statements, pictures of the crime scene, measurements of the area around the intersection that the incident happened in.I prepared affidavits for witnesses; Located and reviewed records, and discovery from entire period of arrest to crime charged, to trial.
Synopsis 3
Case: District of Columbia vs. Kevin Honesty
Jurisdiction: Superior Court of District of Columbia
Charge: 18 Counts of 1st Degree Murder (Triple Homicide)
Disposition: JURY TRIAL - VERDICT NOT GUILTY
Defense Counsel: CALL TO FIND OUT!!!
Criminal Defense Investigator: Paris
London 1.877.202.8787
Prosecution's theory of the case: A drug deal gone bad, resulting
in triple homicide; crime committed ten years before client was
charged.
Details of Investigation: Conduct background investigations and
interview client regarding current case and prior criminal history;
located residents of the crime scene; interviewed every person
who lived around the crime scene when crime was committed in ten
years prior; took photos and video taped crime scene; located three
witnesses who were paid informants, and in witness protection program;
took tape recorded statements from the three paid informants who
recanted their grand jury testimony; revealed amount paid to informants;
located telephone, and pager toll records from ten year period
prior to crime charged; located employees of telephone and pager
companies going back over ten year period; obtained and reviewed
medical records of the three victims; traced all in/out calls placed
on victims cellular phone and located every person called; interviewed
all persons who spoke with victim on day of murder; obtained tape-recorded
statements from eyewitnesses to murder stating defendant had no
involvement.
Synopsis 4
Case: State of Florida vs. Aaron Eddins
Jurisdiction: Circuit Court for Miami-Dade, Florida
Charge: Second Degree Murder
Disposition: JURY TRIAL-VERDICT NOT GUILTY
Defense Counsel: CALL TO FIND OUT!!!
Criminal Defense Investigator: Paris
London 1.877.202.8787
Prosecution's theory of the case: The defendant was suicidal for
robbing a drug dealer of a lot of drugs and money. The defendant
decided to use the drugs he stole; he got three prostitutes and
started partying. Instead of putting a gun to his head, when the
drug dealer found him he shot and killed the drug dealer at point
blank range in front of three eye witnesses.
Details of Investigation: Conduct background investigations and
interview client regarding current case and prior criminal history;
located and interviewed all involved witnesses. Interviewed an
eyewitness that stated the decedent had a 44 magnum in a holster
on his leg at the crime scene before he was shot. Learned identity
of confidential informants unnamed in the warrant application;
determined that primary government witnesses were three area prostitutes
that was at the scene of the day of the crime; located identities
of witnesses who were informants, and one eye witness who alleged
that the police would not take his statement or his identifying
information because he was homeless. Took statements, and prepared
affidavits for witnesses; Located and reviewed records, and discovery
from entire period of arrest to crime charged, to trial.
Synopsis 5
Case: District of Columbia vs. Desiree Smith
Jurisdiction: Superior Court of District of Columbia
Charge: 1st Degree Murder; Manslaughter
Disposition: JURY TRIAL- VERDICT NOT GUILTY
Defense Counsel: CALL TO FIND OUT!!!
Criminal Defense Investigator: Paris
London 1.877.202.8787
Prosecution's theory of the case: while client was pregnant, she
got into an altercation at her house with her current child's father
other baby mother this altercation let to her ending up at a hospital
with eleven stab wounds to her chest, after she drove away from
the clients house with no visible signs of bleeding this victim
ultimately expired, her child's fathers, old girlfriend and current
child's mother came.
Details of Investigation: Conduct background investigation and
interview client regarding current case and prior criminal history;
interviewed and located three eyewitnesses that revealed the following:
1. That no one could attest to seeing blood on victim's clothing;
2. That no one could accurately describe the murder weapon;
3. The route taken to the hospital was 45 minutes out of the way,
that the victim was conscious and driving when she left the crime
scene;
4. The victim started the confrontation
Obtained information that the prosecution was giving special consideration
to un indicted co-conspirator for testifying against client. Located
and interviewed grand jury witnesses that recanted their testimony
at trial. Took pictures of crime scene and prepare several diagrams,
exhibits, and charts for trial.
Synopsis 6
CASE: State of Florida v. Daniel Coleman
JURISDICTION: Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Florida
CHARGE: Second Degree Felony Murder, and Burglary to an unoccupied
structure
DISPOSITION: JURY TRIAL- VERDICT NOT GUILTY
DEFENSE COUNSEL: CALL TO FIND OUT !!!
Criminal Defense Investigator: Paris
London 1.877.202.8787
PROSECUTION’S THEORY OF THE CASE: The client and the decedent nearly
ran their van over a Miami-Dade officer after stealing products
from a gas station, the police officer fired at the van, fatally
striking the driver (decedent). The van zoomed through six lanes
of traffic, hopping a median, before plowing into an all-night
coin Laundromat, and terrorizing customers.
DETAILS OF INVESTIGATION: Conducted background investigations and
interviewed client regarding current case and prior criminal history;
investigated and determined who was present at the time of the
incident. Located, and reviewed prior case reports. Determined
clients alibi, and interview alibi witnesses, obtain crime grid,
and canvass area reports. Obtain police communication records,
and reports. Review 911 tapes, and transcribe. Take pictures of
every crime scene, construct diagram of all crime scenes. Locate,
and perform background investigation on all involved witnesses/
victims. Criminal records check on all government and victim witnesses
that testified on case. Conducted internal affairs investigation
on all involved police officers.
Synopsis 7
CASE: District of Columbia vs. Roscoe Craig
Jurisdiction: Superior Court of District of Columbia
Charge: 1st Degree Murder
Disposition: JURY TRIAL- VERDICT NOT GUILTY
Defense Counsel: CALL TO FIND OUT!!!
Criminal Defense Investigator: Paris
London 1.877.202.8787
Prosecution's theory of the case: The victim threaten the defendants
stepson prior to him being shot. The defendant planned executed
and committed premeditated murder by shooting the victim three
times and killing him. The defendant also laid and waited for the
exact time to commit this crime.
Details of Investigation: Conduct background investigations and
interview client regarding current case and prior criminal history;
located and interviewed all crime scene witnesses / eyewitnesses.
Took measurements of crime scene, prepared crime scene sketches & drawings.
Located other motives and possible suspects of crime. Took photos
and video taped crime scenes Obtain and help design numerous trial
exhibits consisting of charts, graphs, and diagrams for trial.
Located Information revealing actions taken by Homicide Detective
in charge was improper procedure for a law enforcement officer,
used by defense counsel in successful cross-examination.
| References: |
JACK DENARO ESQ.
Miami, FL 305.274.9550 |
OSCAR RODRIGUEZ ESQ.
Miami, FL 305.445.2000 |
MARVIN MILLER ESQ.
Alexandria, VA 703.548.5000 |
STEPHEN ROSEN ESQ.
Miami, FL 305.358.678 |
WILLIAM MURPHY ESQ.
Baltimore, MD 410.539.6500 |
MARC SEITLES ESQ.
Miami, FL 305.379.6667 |
BRIAN MCDANIEL ESQ.
Washington, DC 202.331.0794 |
JONATHON FREIDMAN ESQ.
Ft. Lauderdale, FL954.713.2820 |
CRAIG RICARD ESQ.
Washington, DC 202.331.0793 |
JAMIE BENJAMIN ESQ.
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 954.779.1700 |
RODERICK VEREEN ESQ.
Miami, FL 305.576.1011 |
BENEDICT KUEHNE ESQ.
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 305.789.5989 |
NEIL SCHUSTER ESQ.
Miami, 305.416.0325 |
STEPHEN GOLEMBE ESQ.
Miami, FL 305.858.1018 |
CURT OBRONT ESQ.
Miami FL 305.373.1040 |
NATALIE OCE ESQ.
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 954.961.2228 |
|