Homicide Investigator
Types Of Murder Cases & Investigations Representative Case Reviews References

 

HOMICIDE INVESTIGATION

We Specialize in the following types of Murder cases:
Homicide    Felony Murder
1st Degree Murder 2nd Degree Murder
Manslaughter Assault w/intent to kill
Death Penalty Conspiracy To Commit Murder

q

Homicide is the killing of one person by another. There are a variety of homicide charges used in the United States, such as First Degree murder, Second Degree Murder, and Manslaughter. All homicide charges require a thorough, effective, competent and aggressive defense team., consisting of a skilled criminal defense lawyer, and a thorough criminal defense investigator that specializes in homicide investigation, However, it is possible in some instances to charge a defendant under the federal murder statute, which in some cases allows for the death penalty.

First degree murder requires pre-mediation. In other words, a prosecutor must prove that a person thought out the murder beforehand and specifically formulated an intention to kill the victim. First degree murder is the most serious criminal charge in Michigan law, and is punishable by mandatory life in prison, without possibility of parole. Michigan law does not allow for the death penalty for any charge, including first degree murder.

Felony murder is a special class of first degree. This crime involves the loss of life during the commission of specific felonies. These felonies include Arson, Criminal Sexual Conduct, First Degree Child Abuse, major controlled substance offenses, Robbery, Carjacking, Home invasion, Larceny, Extortion, and Kidnapping. Michigan law mandates life in prison for any person found guilty of felony murder.

Second degree murder. Second degree murder is a lesser charge, however it still caries a potential severe punishment. In a second degree murder charge, the prosecution is not charged with the obligation to prove that the person thought out the killing beforehand. Second degree murder is punishable by life in prison, or any term of years. However, the possibility of parole does exist.

Manslaughter has two degrees, voluntary and involuntary. In all cases, manslaughter is the unlawful killing of another without malice. Voluntary manslaughter involves an intentional killing, but one that is done in the heat of passion. Involuntary manslaughter is an unintentional killing. In both cases, manslaughter is punishable by 15 years in prison.

Our Approach to Charges of Homicide

A successful defense requires a thorough knowledge of the details. In all cases, your knowledge of the facts is important and must be thoroughly explored with the defense  team. Attempts must be made to interview all witnesses.We are trained and experienced in preparing homicide cases for the defense.  The niche that we have in the criminal investigation market is that, all of our investigators are street savvy and African American. A major objective of any good criminal defense homicide investigator is help the defense Attorney to break down prosecution witnesses by utilizing vigorous cross examination techniques, thus reducing, if not eliminating their credibility and the weight given to their testimony by the judge or jury. This is where our expertise augments defense efforts.

We provide critical investigations into all aspects of the defense case, which include location of witnesses and leads, obtaining statements, evaluation of police investigations, evidence collection and review, independent analysis, background investigations, crime scene investigations, documentation analysis and regional canvassing, mitigation evidence, photographic and videotape evidence as well as other services directed by the client.

The Agency gathers essential evidence, and witnesses that not only support your case, but aid in critical determinations that influence the outcome of verdicts.

We at the agency have special access and an intimate understanding of the minority community, which has cultivated our unique niche in the field of criminal investigations

 

Expert witnesses can be a key element of your defense. While not all cases require the use of experts, there are many cases where scientific experts can be invaluable. This may include such experts as DNA scientists, medical doctors, psychologists, document and handwriting analysis experts, fingerprint & "voiceprint" experts and police investigation experts. It is not possible to know what experts may be needed until your case is thoroughly evaluated The agency is committed to help finding the best scientific experts available in defense of our clients.

Police investigations must be carefully scrutinized. In our system of justice, it is defense attorneys that force law enforcement personnel to play by the rules. In our criminal defense investigative agency, we find it beneficial to our clients to challenge unlawful intrusions on your rights. Our team of professionals will carefully examine your case for violations of law, which can be asserted in your defense.

If You are Facing Homicide Charges

Let's begin with the understanding that the police are not your friends and they are not there to help you. It is legal to for the police to lie to you. Promises made by the police are not enforceable. Miranda warnings may not help you, so if the police are investigating:

  • Don't negotiate with police without an attorney. In most cases, police will attempt to secure your cooperation before you have a chance to talk to an attorney. They are aware that a person accused of a homicide is never more vulnerable than at the time of the first arrest or raid. Before you compromise your position in the case, obtain competent legal advise from an aggressive trial lawyer.
  • Do not talk. Be polite and courteous, but refuse to discuss their investigation with them. You should plainly and repeatedly tell them that you do not want to discuss anything with them, and that you want an attorney present. Do not allow yourself to be tricked or coerced by the police.
  • Anything you say about the case to anyone, including most family members, can be used against you in court. Many defendants hurt their case by discussing it with family, friends, co-workers, police officers and prosecutors. If you have made such statements, we will deal with it together. If you have not, DON'T!
  • Never consent to anything without the advice of your attorney. This includes giving the police permission to search, draw blood or discuss the case with you.
  • Never resist arrest. If a police officer is attempting to arrest you, be polite and cooperative. Inform the officer that you will go along peacefully. It is also important to immediately inform the officer -or any officer that tries to question you- that you do not want to talk without an attorney.
  • The only information you should provide without consulting an attorney is necessary biographical information; this includes your full legal name and address. If the police want to fingerprint you after arrest cooperate fully.
  • Inform the officers that you wish to make a telephone call. Get an attorney quickly, if you call family or friends have them contact an attorney. Our criminal defense investigators are  on call at all times of the day and night. You can reach us at 1-1.877.202.8787
  • Post bond as quickly as possible. If you are arraigned and asked how you plead, your response should be, "I stand mute." At the arraignment, do not try to talk to the judge about your case.
  • If you are unable to post bond, don't say anything about your case to anyone in the jail. There is no one there that you can trust.

 

 

q

 

 

  
q

Criminal & White Collar Investigations


We are experts in criminal investigation. We conduct timely, and thorough investigations in the following areas, that may involve alleged criminal activity:

Conspiracy

Corporate Crimes

Counterfeiting

Currency & Securities

Death Penalty

Due Diligence

Embezzlement

Fraud

Homicide

Kidnapping

Litigation Support

Money Laundering

Multi-Codefendant

Narcotics

Public Corruption

Robbery

Sexual Assault &
Harassment

Smuggling

Theft

Trafficking

A major objective of any good criminal defense is to break down prosecution witnesses by utilizing vigorous cross examination techniques, thus reducing if not eliminating their credibility and the weight given to their testimony by the judge or jury. This is where our expertise augments defense efforts.

We provide critical investigations into all aspects of the defense case, which includes location of witnesses and leads, obtaining statements, evaluation of police investigation, evidence collection and review, independent analysis, background investigations, crime scene investigations, documentation analysis and regional canvassing, mitigation evidence, photographic and videotape evidence as well as other services directed by the client.

The Agency gathers essential evidence, and witnesses that not only support your case, but aid in critical determinations that influence the outcome of verdicts.

We at the agency have special access and a intimate understanding of the minority community, which has cultivated our unique niche in the field of criminal investigations.

Representative Case Reviews

Synopsis 1

Case: United States vs. Salvador Magluta
Jurisdiction: Southern District of Florida
Charge: Conspiracy; Witness Tampering; Obstruction Of Justice; Forfeiture; Murder; Money- Laundering
Disposition: JURY TRIAL - Acquitted of 31 counts of a 43 count Indictment
DEFENSE COUNSEL: CALL TO FIND OUT !!!
Criminal Defense Investigator: Paris London 1.877.202.8787

Prosecution's theory of case: client ran the biggest drug organization in the United States, and after he was acquitted by a jury of his peers for trafficking 72 tons of cocaine, he was only acquitted because he caused three murders of witnesses that was suppose to testify at trial, and laundered 25 millions dollars of illegal proceeds to pay for his defense. Along with bribing the jury, and tampering with government witness, and obstructing justice.

Details of Investigation: Conduct background investigations and interviewed client regarding current case and prior criminal history; investigated and located over 150 defense witnesses housed in federal institutions nationwide. Interviewed and did extensive background, criminal history, and family location checks. Interviewed and located over 150 civilian witness from a ledger dating between 1985-1995 consisting of 25 million dollars worth of disbursements. Took pictures and investigated three homicide cases and crime scenes. Located and retrieved numerous records, documents, and reports nationwide regarding clients past and present cases. Located names and address of all governmental confidential informants, and dates of debriefings. Located the following toll records: cellular, pager, and home telephone. Located and investigated the panel of jurors that set on clients prior case where he was acquitted of 72 tons of cocaine. Subpoenaed numerous witness, and documents nationwide for case. Obtain and help design numerous trial exhibits consisting of charts, graphs, and diagrams. Testified at trial.

Synopsis 2

Case: United States vs. Jerome Earls
Jurisdiction: Superior Court for the District of Columbia
Charge: Murder I While Armed (Premeditated)
Disposition: JURY TRIAL-VERDICT NOT GUILTY
Defense Counsel: CALL TO FIND OUT!!!
Criminal Defense Investigator: Paris London 1.877.202.8787
Prosecution's theory of the case: The defendant rode around Northeast Washington DC looking for the victim. The defendant rode past the victims mothers house, as well as the victims girlfriend house on the day that the victim was killed. The victim was killed when he pulled up at a light that the defendant was stopped at. The victim had his girlfriend in the car with him. This whole case was about the victim owing the defendant for an unpaid drug debt.
Details of Investigation: Conduct background investigations and interview client regarding current case and prior criminal history; located and interviewed all involved witnesses. Interviewed an eyewitness that stated the decedents conversation consisted of killing the defendant everyday. That the decedent rode around looking for the defendant, and calling his girlfriends cell phone trying to find out where the defendant resided. I learned the identity of the only eyewitness to the murder (the decedent’s girlfriend). Found out that the decedent’s mother was arrested for threatening the decedent’s girlfriend. Took statements, pictures of the crime scene, measurements of the area around the intersection that the incident happened in.I prepared affidavits for witnesses; Located and reviewed records, and discovery from entire period of arrest to crime charged, to trial.

Synopsis 3

Case: District of Columbia vs. Kevin Honesty
Jurisdiction: Superior Court of District of Columbia
Charge: 18 Counts of 1st Degree Murder (Triple Homicide)
Disposition: JURY TRIAL - VERDICT NOT GUILTY
Defense Counsel: CALL TO FIND OUT!!!
Criminal Defense Investigator: Paris London 1.877.202.8787

Prosecution's theory of the case: A drug deal gone bad, resulting in triple homicide; crime committed ten years before client was charged.

Details of Investigation: Conduct background investigations and interview client regarding current case and prior criminal history; located residents of the crime scene; interviewed every person who lived around the crime scene when crime was committed in ten years prior; took photos and video taped crime scene; located three witnesses who were paid informants, and in witness protection program; took tape recorded statements from the three paid informants who recanted their grand jury testimony; revealed amount paid to informants; located telephone, and pager toll records from ten year period prior to crime charged; located employees of telephone and pager companies going back over ten year period; obtained and reviewed medical records of the three victims; traced all in/out calls placed on victims cellular phone and located every person called; interviewed all persons who spoke with victim on day of murder; obtained tape-recorded statements from eyewitnesses to murder stating defendant had no involvement.

Synopsis 4

Case: State of Florida vs. Aaron Eddins
Jurisdiction: Circuit Court for Miami-Dade, Florida
Charge: Second Degree Murder
Disposition: JURY TRIAL-VERDICT NOT GUILTY
Defense Counsel: CALL TO FIND OUT!!!
Criminal Defense Investigator: Paris London 1.877.202.8787

Prosecution's theory of the case: The defendant was suicidal for robbing a drug dealer of a lot of drugs and money. The defendant decided to use the drugs he stole; he got three prostitutes and started partying. Instead of putting a gun to his head, when the drug dealer found him he shot and killed the drug dealer at point blank range in front of three eye witnesses.

Details of Investigation: Conduct background investigations and interview client regarding current case and prior criminal history; located and interviewed all involved witnesses. Interviewed an eyewitness that stated the decedent had a 44 magnum in a holster on his leg at the crime scene before he was shot. Learned identity of confidential informants unnamed in the warrant application; determined that primary government witnesses were three area prostitutes that was at the scene of the day of the crime; located identities of witnesses who were informants, and one eye witness who alleged that the police would not take his statement or his identifying information because he was homeless. Took statements, and prepared affidavits for witnesses; Located and reviewed records, and discovery from entire period of arrest to crime charged, to trial.

Synopsis 5

Case: District of Columbia vs. Desiree Smith
Jurisdiction: Superior Court of District of Columbia
Charge: 1st Degree Murder; Manslaughter
Disposition: JURY TRIAL- VERDICT NOT GUILTY
Defense Counsel: CALL TO FIND OUT!!!
Criminal Defense Investigator: Paris London 1.877.202.8787

Prosecution's theory of the case: while client was pregnant, she got into an altercation at her house with her current child's father other baby mother this altercation let to her ending up at a hospital with eleven stab wounds to her chest, after she drove away from the clients house with no visible signs of bleeding this victim ultimately expired, her child's fathers, old girlfriend and current child's mother came.

Details of Investigation: Conduct background investigation and interview client regarding current case and prior criminal history; interviewed and located three eyewitnesses that revealed the following:
1. That no one could attest to seeing blood on victim's clothing;
2. That no one could accurately describe the murder weapon;
3. The route taken to the hospital was 45 minutes out of the way, that the victim was conscious and driving when she left the crime scene;
4. The victim started the confrontation
Obtained information that the prosecution was giving special consideration to un indicted co-conspirator for testifying against client. Located and interviewed grand jury witnesses that recanted their testimony at trial. Took pictures of crime scene and prepare several diagrams, exhibits, and charts for trial.

Synopsis 6

CASE: State of Florida v. Daniel Coleman
JURISDICTION: Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Florida
CHARGE: Second Degree Felony Murder, and Burglary to an unoccupied structure
DISPOSITION: JURY TRIAL- VERDICT NOT GUILTY
DEFENSE COUNSEL: CALL TO FIND OUT !!!
Criminal Defense Investigator: Paris London 1.877.202.8787

PROSECUTION’S THEORY OF THE CASE: The client and the decedent nearly ran their van over a Miami-Dade officer after stealing products from a gas station, the police officer fired at the van, fatally striking the driver (decedent). The van zoomed through six lanes of traffic, hopping a median, before plowing into an all-night coin Laundromat, and terrorizing customers.
DETAILS OF INVESTIGATION: Conducted background investigations and interviewed client regarding current case and prior criminal history; investigated and determined who was present at the time of the incident. Located, and reviewed prior case reports. Determined clients alibi, and interview alibi witnesses, obtain crime grid, and canvass area reports. Obtain police communication records, and reports. Review 911 tapes, and transcribe. Take pictures of every crime scene, construct diagram of all crime scenes. Locate, and perform background investigation on all involved witnesses/ victims. Criminal records check on all government and victim witnesses that testified on case. Conducted internal affairs investigation on all involved police officers.

Synopsis 7

CASE: District of Columbia vs. Roscoe Craig
Jurisdiction: Superior Court of District of Columbia
Charge: 1st Degree Murder
Disposition: JURY TRIAL- VERDICT NOT GUILTY
Defense Counsel: CALL TO FIND OUT!!!
Criminal Defense Investigator: Paris London 1.877.202.8787

Prosecution's theory of the case: The victim threaten the defendants stepson prior to him being shot. The defendant planned executed and committed premeditated murder by shooting the victim three times and killing him. The defendant also laid and waited for the exact time to commit this crime.
Details of Investigation: Conduct background investigations and interview client regarding current case and prior criminal history; located and interviewed all crime scene witnesses / eyewitnesses. Took measurements of crime scene, prepared crime scene sketches & drawings. Located other motives and possible suspects of crime. Took photos and video taped crime scenes Obtain and help design numerous trial exhibits consisting of charts, graphs, and diagrams for trial. Located Information revealing actions taken by Homicide Detective in charge was improper procedure for a law enforcement officer, used by defense counsel in successful cross-examination.


Our Satisfied Customers
Benedict Kuehne Esq.
FL 305.789.5989

www.Kuehnuehnelaw.com
ben.kuehne@kuehnelaw.com

Brian McDaniel Esq.
DC 202.331.0793

Brianmac1911@aol.com
Marc Seitles Esq.
FL 305.379.6667

www.Seitleslaw.com
mseitles@seitleslaw.com

Roderick Vereen Esq.
FL 305.576.1011

Vereen2469@aol.com

Curt Obront Esq.
FL 305.373.1040

www.Obrontlaw.com
curt@obrontlaw.com

Stephen Rosen Esq.
FL 305.448.9900

attnyrosen@aol.com

Nardine Guirgus Atty.
NC 919.832.0500

www.Guirguislaw.com
nardine@guirguislaw.com

Jackie Perczek Atty.
FL 305.371.6421

www.RoyBlack.com
JPerczek@RoyBlack.com

Marvin Miller Esq.
VA 703.548.5000

www.Marvinmilleratlaw.com
katherine@marvinmilleratlaw.com

Neil M. Schuster, P.A.
FL 305.416.0324

www.neilmschuster.com/
nmschus@bellsouth.net

William Murphy Esq.
MD 410.539.6500

www.Murphypa.com
billy.murphy@murphypa.com

Frank Doddato Esq.NY516.794.3737

 


For more information call
1-877-202-8787
Nationwide Service
or visit
http://www.the-detectiveagency.com/

http://www.narcoticsinvestigators.com/

http://www.defenseinvestigators.com/

q

E-mail